House Sparrow x Spanish Sparrow

possible House Sparrow x Spanish Sparrow hybrid or House Sparrow x Eurasian Tree Sparrow hybrid or Italian Sparrow, Northrepps (Norfolk, UK), 18th August 2013 - copyright Dave Appleton

(photo ID: 1776)

When this curious bird was found the possibility that it was an Italian Sparrow was mooted.  Indeed it has been submitted as such but the British Birds Rarities Committee have effectively pended the record until taxonomy or identification criteria are resolved (British Birds 108: 630).  A 'classic' Italian Sparrow should not have any grey in the crown but it seems that birds in the north of the range (presumably where introgression with House Sparrow still occurs?) may have some grey in the crown. 

In the photo above it looks as though it has a hint of a dark spot at the lower back of the cheeks, which would strongly suggest Eurasian Tree Sparrow involvement.  I didn't think this was a real plumage feature though - just the way the feathers were lying.  Indeed the absence of a dark spot in the cheeks was one reason I doubted what some people eventually concluded, which is that it was a House Sparrow x Eurasian Tree Sparrow hybrid.  Most House Sparrow x Eurasian Tree Sparrows I've seen photos of have had at least a small dark spot in the cheeks (see also our House Sparrow x Eurasian Tree Sparrow page).

Another reason to doubt that was the almost complete absence of grey in the crown.  There were a few spots of grey in the forecrown - at the time we thought at least some of these were effects of moult - feather bases being visible where feathers were missing or loose - but as they appear in other photos taken later on including in 2014 when it reappeared briefly, they must have been a real plumage feature after all.  Most House Sparrow x Eurasian Tree Sparrow hybrids have more grey in the crown than this.

The bill was large, possibly suggesting Spanish/Italian Sparrow involvement and there were none of the buffy tones to the body that are often displayed by House Sparrow x Eurasian Tree Sparrow hybrids (actually some other poeple's photos do seem to show such tones, but not in all frames and covering a different area in different frames - I think those images may be showing the bird after it had been bathing in dust - I have seen House Sparrows with a similar effect from bathing in dust).  I wondered if it might instead by a House Sparrow x Spanish Sparrow hybrid.  It looks a lot like an Italian Sparrow and Italian Sparrows are meant to be the product of hybridisation between House Sparrows and Spanish Sparrows, so this does seem a realistic possibility.  A few Spanish Sparrows have turned up in the UK and spent time - even whole summers - with House Sparrows.  None have been known to produce hybrids but how many others have been overlooked or not even seen - especially if they were females?  It doesn't seem a terribly implausible explanation.

To progress this further I suspect we will need to get better knowledge of the extent of variation in House Sparrow x Eurasian Tree Sparrow hybrids and also a better understanding of what first-generation House Sparrow x Spanish Sparrow hybrids look like, and of course the range of variation in Italian Sparrow.

possible House Sparrow x Spanish Sparrow hybrid or House Sparrow x Eurasian Tree Sparrow hybrid or Italian Sparrow (same bird as in photo ID 1776 above), Northrepps (Norfolk, UK), 18th August 2013 - copyright Dave Appleton

(photo IDs: 1777-1779)

My original analysis of this bird, along with extra photos, can be found here.  More images of this bird from other photographers and on other dates appear here and here.


Note that Italian Sparrow taxon is now considered to be a result of hybrid speciation.  A population of House Sparrow x Spanish Sparrow hybrids have eventually become stabilised and more-or-less reproductively isolated from their ancestor taxa.



House Sparrow Passer domesticus
Italian Sparrow Passer italiae
Spanish Sparrow Passer hispaniolensis
Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer montanus

Hybrid speciation

Hybrid speciation is the process whereby a population of hybrids becomes sufficiently well reproductively isolated from its parent species that it represents a third new species.  Until recently it seems that it wasn't considered to play a significant factor in the evolution of bird species.

Where hybrids of two species are fertile and the two species ranges overlap a zone of hybridisation may occur.  Within this zone the two species come into contact with one another, hybridise, and the hybrids mate with either species or other hybrids.  Eventually a high proportion of the population within the overlap zone - perhaps even the entire population within the middle of the zone - are hybrids.  In some cases the hybrids in the middle of the zone have become stable and look very similar to one another.

If this zone is broad, observers may see three different-looking types of birds in three different geographic regions.  Sometimes this has led to all three types of bird being classified as species.  However, at the edges of the overlap zone the hybrids are not usually reproductively isolated from the species they are close to and so if you look across the whole range it can be seen that there is intergradation between the two species with hybrids in the middle.

In his "Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World" (Oxford University Press 2006), Eugene M McCarthy devotes a section to "Hybrids treated as taxa" and he describes this sort of situation.  The clear implication is that whilst these hybrids have sometimes been classified as species, this classification was wrong as they are in fact hybrids.  He does not mention hybrid speciation at all (unless I've missed it somewhere else in the book) and it would appear that this is the end of the story.  'Hybrid species' are wrongly classified - they are hybrids but not species.

From the book, this seems to be the end of the story.  Since it was written mainstream understanding about hybrid speciation seems to taken a leap forward.  It now seems that while the situation described by McCarthy may still be true for many hybrids incorrectly classified as species, there are some cases where the situation is a little different.  In some cases hybrids in the middle of the overlap zone have not only become stable in their appearance but they have somehow managed to become reproductively isolated from the species at either side of the overlap zone.  They have actually become a new third species.

The best known example is Italian Sparrow.  Over the years taxonomists have classified the Italian Sparrow variously as a race of House Sparrow, a race of Spanish Sparrow, a third species or a hybrid between House Sparrow and Spanish Sparrow.  It is now understood that it did indeed originate as a hybrid between House Sparrow and Spanish Sparrow, but is now sufficiently well reproductively isolated from both House Sparrow and Spanish Sparrow that it has become a new species.

Italian Sparrow, Etang d'Urbino (Corsica, France), 16th April 2008 - copyright Dave Appleton

(photo ID: 1773)

Of course speciation takes a long time, and for a newly formed species there may be anomalies.  And with Italian Sparrows you can see that in the south of their range the birds' appearance is not as stable as it seems throughout most of Italy.  In the south many look more like Spanish Sparrow, but they are variable.  Nevertheless I understand that further north there is a sympatric population of Spanish Sparrows on the east coast that remain distinct.  In the north of the range where they come into contact with House Sparrow there is a narrow zone of ongoing hybridisation.

Italian Sparrow or Italian Sparrow x Spanish Sparrow intergrade, Syracusa (Sicilly, Italy), 23rd April 2012 - copyright Dave Appleton

(photo ID: 1774)

 Italian Sparrow or Italian Sparrow x Spanish Sparrow intergrade, Capo Murro di Porco (Sicilly, Italy), 2nd May 2012 - copyright Dave Appleton

(photo ID: 1775)

The language becomes quite technical (too much so for me to follow in full) but there is a summary of the situation in The Molecular Ecologist here.


I understand that Pomarine Skua (Jaeger) is now thought likely to have originated as a hybrid between Great Skua and one of the smaller northern skuas (jaegers in US) (I assume Arctic Skua - or Parasitic Jaeger if you're American - but I've not read anything that confirms that).

Pomarine Skua, MV Sapphire pelagic trip (Scilly, UK), 12th August 2012 - copyright Dave Appleton

(photo ID: 1772)

McCarthy's Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World may not deal with hybrid speciation but his website does.  Indeed if I have understood correcftly it forms the basis of what McCarthy presents as "stabilization theory, an alternative theory of evolution", and he concludes that stabilisation processes are sufficient explanation for the origin of the vast majority of living forms, contrary to neo-Darwinian theory.  I think it's fair to say that some of McCarthy's theories (which include the origin of humans being pig x chimp hybrids) are some way from being accepted by the majority of the scientific community.

If McCarthy is right then we should not be surprised to find many other examples of avian hybrid speciation - and probably so even if he is not right.  McCarthy does mention a few other examples, though as yet I am not sure how many of these are undisputed.

Let us know if you are aware of any other bird hybrids that have become full species..


Species mentioned:
Great Skua Stercorarius skua (formerly Catharacta skua)
Pomarine Jaeger (Pomarine Skua) Stercorarius pomarinus
Parsitic Jaeger (Arctic Skua) Stercorarius parasiticus
House Sparrow Passer domesticus
Italian Sparrow Passer italiae
Spanish Sparrow Passer hispaniolensis